Nyalfi and Dack

[Robpthegills]

So, anybody want to tell me whats different to this and ched evans.

I am totally confused reading this story. Apparantly Nyalfi and the female involved state Dack was in the room whilst Nyalfi had sex with the woman. So if in fact the CPS believe Nyalfi was raping her, surely by playing with himself in the corner of the room Dack was an accessory to the fact.

This has direct comparisons with the ched evans case. Are we not talking about it because its one of our own??

I am not on a negative here. This girl claimed she had never seen Nyalfi before and then they showed footage of her snogging him earlier, so she is hardly an angel, just wandering whats peoples thoughts.

I ask this as I believe Evans deserved a chance back in football

[gillsfan1066]

I think if I was Mr. Dack I would probably be asking to be loaned out to Pyongyang City Sports Club in the DPR Korea League,for the rest of this season and maybe next, I am sure Kim Jong-Un would welcome him with open arms or something.
Think I would rather be know as the guy who was having sex with the woman (assuming it was consensual) not the guy sitting in the corner playing the banjo.
How the hell do these people get themselves into such awkward situations, I guess we all have skeletons in our cupboard , but hell aren't there enough girls that would go out and sleep with Mr. Dack ? Do they test players for drug use in the 1st Division ?

[Garawa]

I'm guessing the crucial fact here is that the person accused was forced to retire from football. Although Dack was there it can be argued that he "wouldn't have known" it wasn't consensual and is why only Nyafli is on trial. Therefore there is no comparison with Ched Evans as Nyafli is effectively a member of the public. I don't know all the facts in the Evans case but I believe it hinged on the fact she didn't consent. In this case there was consent with Dack so it's all about whether she said yes to it all and is not like the Evans case in that respect.

Bit of an embarrassing situation to be embroiled in and footballers are doing more harm to themselves than good. I fully expected Dack to be dropped Tuesday but instead he seemed buoyed up by it all, even with chants from the crowd of "He w***s when he wants"!!!

[Elgrande]

Seems BBC Radio Kent were banned from the ground because of their reporting of the incident?

[Elgrande]

Club Statement


Radio Kent will not be broadcasting from Priestfield Stadium today due to a matter involving the Chairman.

The Club apologises for any inconvenience caused to fans not attending the game today.

Hopefully this matter will be resolved ASAP.

Read more at http://www.gillinghamfootballclub.com/n ... hzO1j5p.99

I would guess that we won't get an honest comment.

[gillsfan1066]

Oh good grief ,so much for free speech, that will teach you not to buy a ticket for the game, lol. I guess he will be marching on al-Baghdadi tomorrow with his Daesh Brothers. What the hell is wrong with this guy, I bet when he gets to heaven first thing he says to God is slide over a bit, I need to sit down.

[Garawa]

I heard two stories. 1 - Radio Kent said it happened in a property owned by Scally that he disputes. If so, I would feel aggrieved as well and can understand his decision, after all, would you give your property to a party animal young employee? 2 - Radio Kent used the #gills twitter handle on their reporting of the case effectively bringing the players, the on field action and everyone at the club embroiled in a case that involved a member of the public. When I got there even Peter Lloyd didn't know what was happening so I don't know what story is true but I can appreciate why this decision may have been taken for either of those. I hope its sorted soon but Radio Kent said after the game they stand by their journalism so I doubt it will!

[Elgrande]

I think the report actually said that the girl was taken back to a property that is owned by Scally which is used to house loan players and or new signings. The problem with this normal "throw my toys out of my Scally pram" action was it deprived Gills Player contributors of being able to get a Gills commentary and a usual hasty decision makes the club look pathetic again.

[Rimshot]

As ever it's Scally first GFC second. He really doesn't have an ounce of class.

[gillsfan1066]

It was a common thing many years ago to pay your employees with tokens, that could only be used in the company stores,for food ,clothing etc and to pay for the rent on the company house, seems Scally took a leaf out of Henry Ford and a few others books.
Yes Garawa I can understand Scally being upset, oh and by the way, you people in seats Row B seat 5,23, and Row H ,seats 32 and 11, Scally heard you say what the **** was that when we missed a pass and it went for a throw, your GONE, turn your season tickets it, no refunds, go go go,never darken Priestfields door steps again.

[shoutingman]

So, anybody want to tell me whats different to this and ched evans. ?

The difference is that Ched Evans was convicted in a court of law and Nathan Nyafli has been cleared.
Bradley Dack was never accused.

http://www.kentonline.co.uk/maidstone/n ... ape-31944/

That's a major difference. Hopefully they'll be more choosy next time..............

[Robpthegills]

Hiya Shoutingman

I agree with the obvious. However Ched Evans pleaded innocence and still pleads his innocence. His jury found him guilty albeit there are terrible gaps in the evidence and I think had he not been a footballer the CPS would probably not have taken it to court.

I dont know who is innocent or guilty in this, I do believe Nyalfi and Dack are innocent and the courts have agreed, but the cases are very very much similar.

[shoutingman]

It does look that way, doesn't it? I think the majority on here didn't comment on the Dack case, as the outcome was unknown. Best not to discuss, as there may be nothing to discuss. And that would appear to be the case.
I went onto the Ched Evans website last night. The evidence does appear to be flimsy but, I guess, we weren't in the courtroom................

[Garawa]

I'm not sure that would include the whole entire evidence given, you would expect it to be a little one-sided. There are clearly doubts with that case but what it doesn't do (for now) is change the fact he was convicted and Nyafli (innocent at that moment and found innocent) was being prosecuted for doing something when consent had previously been given. That is quite a big difference but that would have been blurred a lot had the verdict been guilty. Even then the comparisons wouldn't have been the same as Nyafli would be trying to get back into football again after.