Page 1 of 1

My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 2:16 pm
by fan_of_mulligan
My Email complaining to The Football League about Referee Kevin Wright......

To The Football League

I am writing to complain about Referee Kevin Wright who was The Referee at Bramall Lane as Gillingham lost 2 - 1 to Sheffield United on The 27th of September.

I thought Kevin Wright gave some favorable decisions to the host and I felt Sheffield United were awarded some soft free kicks and his decision making wasn't consistent for both sides.

I thought there blatant foul in the build up to Sheffield United's winning goal as Luke Norris was clearly fouled and Gillingham should of been awarded a free kick and I have no idea why nine minutes of additional time were played at the end of The Second Half when The Fourth Official put up six minutes on his board.

I don't think Referee's are accountable for the decisions they make - a poor manager gets sacked, a poor player gets dropped or rested, but a poor referee is in-charge of another match the following week.

I know referee's have a difficult and challenging job, but when Sheffield United score in the 97th minute when six minutes are shown by the fourth official, I feel like Gillingham have been cheated and what happened at the end of today's match was infuriating and that result was difficult to take.

Thank You for reading My Email and I hope I will get a response to the concerns I have raised in this email.



I let you know if I get a response, but even after sleeping on it I still feel like Gillingham have been cheated from earning a point, whether the point is deserved or not is of course up for debate, but those two incident at the end of the match had me and several other Gillingham Supporters at Bramall Lane furious with The Match Officials.

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 6:17 pm
by Kent_UckyFriedGills
I wouldn`t hold your breath FOM,You will probably get the usual bog standard reply.

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 8:20 pm
by CadburyMan
Hear hear

Get over it and get a life.

Without refereeing cock-ups we wouldn't have beaten Shrewsbury and would not have been promoted & Mark Stimson might have gone a season earlier

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Sun Sep 28, 2014 11:08 pm
by gillsfan1066
Lol, you really are serious Ms. Mulligan, you actually sent that to the Football League Headquarters who did you address it to ??
Hang on your answer is coming through,
Dear Miss Fanny Mulligan, thank you for your recent e mail, unfortunately we can not comment on referring decisions.
Please be assured that Shaun Harvey our CEO, Debbie Jevins CEB, our Independent Director and myself will be looking into this matter while we are on our fact finding mission in the Bahamas over the next 21 days.
Thank you for your e mail, I must admit we here at the FL HQ always find it so quaint there are folks like yourself that actually go and watch these type of games, First Division you say, to be honest until I read your letter I never realized we still had one.

Susan Jones, ( temp switch board operator and e mail answer er) on behalf of
Greg Clarke Chairman

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 1:37 pm
by CadburyMan
Pmsl 1066

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 3:01 pm
by fan_of_mulligan
This is The Reply back I have got from The Football League.........................

Thank you for your email, this has been passed through to the referees department for their information.

Firstly, it is worth stating that The League receives numerous queries and complaints regarding individual referee's and match officials’ decisions and their overall performance. Without usually commenting on specific incidents or bookings, we can advise that the performances of all officials are constantly monitored by way of club and assessor reports, match videos or DVD and, at some grounds, Prozone statistics. Matches are also analysed by the Referees' Manager, a referees’ coach and the referee and, despite the perception of some, match officials are most accountable for their performance.

In a general sense, in some cases it is extremely difficult to spot every single incident that occurs on the field of play, whether this be due to the proximity of the ball to players, the position of the referee, or other players obscuring views of the officials. In addition it is a fact that the human element of the sport means referees do also make mistakes during games, just like players and managers do. With only one chance to view every incident, and no benefit of replays, the modern referee has a sometimes difficult task. In all situations the decision of the referee is final.

The Referees’ Manager also works with his group in a bid to constantly improve standards in a game which has become faster and more frenetic over recent years. Every match is recorded and referees are under closer scrutiny than ever before. The match assessor is asked to consider the referee’s and officials’ overall performance and circumstances of the match in determining the mark awarded for his performance. This will include consideration of any proactive or preventative measures taken by the referee which aided his control of the game, of how the referee responded to situations that occurred in the match, and how the referee managed the consequences of any difficult decisions or situations.

Specifically, the assessor is asked to appraise the referee’s performance against the following competencies;

• Application of the Laws of the Game and disciplinary control
• Management of the games and players
• Personality
• Teamwork
• Fitness, positioning and movements

The information shared between the referee and his assessor is not made public and is confidential. This is similar to conversations between a club manager and his players for example but as aforementioned, assessors are present at every match. In addition there are a range of ‘integrity measures’ in place to ensure that referees abide by the high standards required to perform. Should any particular club have reason to query a referee or want to discuss a referee’s performance, they do so by contacting the referees manager.

We trust that this highlights to you the procedures in place designed to improve performances and thank you for contacting us with your comments, which as aforementioned have been noted and passed on.

Thank you for contacting The Football League.

Regards,

Andrew Pomfret
Customer Services Department
The Football League Limited
www.football-league.co.uk


The Football League take these responses into consideration when they decide to appoint there list of referee's for the following season and I felt the need to respond because no way should nine minutes of added time have been played at the end of Saturday's Match and there was a blatant foul on Luke Norris in the build up to there winning goal.

I know we have won games duo to fortuitous refereeing decisions but to put Saturday's Match into context there was nine additional minutes of added time, against Rotherham United in the 2012 / 2013 season there was thirteen minutes because Romain Vincelot was knocked out and had to be taken to hospital.

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 3:15 pm
by Robpthegills
We lost the game because they had nearly 7 shots to every one of ours. They wouldnt give us the ball and they were the better team. We didnt deserve to win.

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Mon Sep 29, 2014 4:40 pm
by gillsfan1066
PMS mate, no just jealous of someone who appears to have hours and hours to write about GFC, and I haven't, lol.

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 4:18 pm
by Rimshot
Being in a minority of one as a Fan of Mulligan must be a lonely life so maybe that explains the time issue. Seriously though, I think we should all acknowledge FOM's commitment as a supporter who genuinely gives a damn about GFC.
So far as the result goes no stats justify a ref making crap decisions and they do 'get away' with rubbish performances quite often. I have always thought the FA/EPL/FL should have a programme which encourages ex pro footballers to go into refereeing. Even if they had only been at the lower echelons of the pro game they would get a sight more respect from the players and would be far less likely to be conned by dive artists or to put up with the current shambles at set pieces.
County cricket umpires are ex players almost without exception and the standard of officiating is much higher than by their football counterparts.

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 8:53 pm
by gillsfan1066
I to am a great fan of the young Ms.Fanny Mulligan, in fact if I lived closer I would probably be trying to woo the young wench, and make my Mother happy by giving her the Grand children she so longs for.
All I beg for is a three liner after the game, I would be a happy camper with that, and then you guys can have the King James length version of the game the next day.
I play golf, after a round in the bar I might just ask someone how they played and they will describe every shot and putt for 18 holes, and all I wanted to know is that they shot an 82 or what ever, lol.

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Tue Sep 30, 2014 9:05 pm
by Garawa
I kind of agree with Rob, these issues will always be there. Goals will always be scored after play should have stopped. Goals will always be scored after the initial added time period has elapsed and we were outclassed so shouldn't look for excuses for our defeat. However FOM is right on one point. How on Earth can you justify 9 minutes of additional time? Had there been a massive stoppage then OK. I could even buy it had there been several goals, 6 subs and a load of time-wasting but I don't think that was the case and I don't think I have ever seen more than 6 at Priestfield when a lengthy stop had not occurred. He would have decided how long to add on about the time they equalised, when the Gills were leading 1-0, and I can't help but wonder if Cloughy's reputation made that decision a little easier.

Rob we deserved to lose, I'm annoyed at how we did it but I thought we would so no problem however simply saying 7 shots to 1 showed we should lose isn't how football works. If he can justify why so much was added then I am happy, otherwise we lost only because of some very generous timekeeping!

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 4:39 pm
by Robpthegills
sorry gary couldnt disagree more if I tried.

Football does work that way. The more times you shoot the more chances you have of scoring.

I agree it doesnt create 9 minutes of injury time, but we were played off of the park. I have spoken to 3 of my friends who went and they all agreed we deserved nothing really.

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 4:59 pm
by fan_of_mulligan
sorry gary couldnt disagree more if I tried.

Football does work that way. The more times you shoot the more chances you have of scoring.

I agree it doesnt create 9 minutes of injury time, but we were played off of the park. I have spoken to 3 of my friends who went and they all agreed we deserved nothing really.


I am not for one minute suggesting that Sheffield United did not deserve to win the game because that's not what I am complaining to The Football League about.

However Luke Norris was blatantly fouled in the build up to Sheffield United's Winning Goal and had the free kick been correctly awarded then Gillingham leave Bramall Lane with a point so while Sheffield United's Winning Goal is deserved from there point of view, it is a controversial goal because the free kick should of been awarded and if the situations were reversed then I am convinced Sheffield United would of had a free kick given in there favour.

I am also questioning where nine minutes of stoppage time came from given that only two goals and four substitutions were made in normal time (five subs by the time Jake Hessenthaler came on), 4 - 5 minutes would of been enough.

Re: My Email to The Football League

PostPosted: Wed Oct 01, 2014 5:26 pm
by Garawa
Football does[n't] work that way. The more times you shoot the more chances you have of scoring.


Rob, you are thinking logically and football is far from being logical! It doesn't matter one jot how many shots at goal you have. In theory we could play a side this season that had 36 shots on target but not score from any of them and yet we win the game 1-0 thanks to an own goal having not managed a single shot on target during the match!!!! We wouldn't deserve the win but we would get it, that's how football goes sometimes. Going by your statement we would lose the game at the very least 10-0.

The same applies to the Sheffield Utd game. I had stated that it sounded as if we didn't deserve anything from the game but it doesn't alter the fact that we were 1-0 up with "3" minutes to go. Is it acceptable for the ref to play as many minutes as required for the team that deserved to win to finally get themselves in front??? Clearly the answer would be no and 9 minutes was far too long.