by Garawa » Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:26 pm
Question is, what alternative would there be? It is a case of:
Cost of running a monachy minus value of tourist income minus business generated from royal connections
against
Cost of paying a President plus loss of above income
I wouldn't mind betting there wouldn't be an awful difference in it, especially as I believe those figures would grow substantially once William becomes King (providing he and has family remain a vision of virtue until then). It is too simplistic to just say they should be got rid of, there are too many variables involved. We have seen how the world (and this country) has responded regarding the jubilee celebrations and is quite clear the country would vote to retain a monarchy if a vote were to be cast. I haven't always agreed with some of the things they have done but I feel a lot has been done to streamline the family in this economic climate. I don't think we would be any better off without them and could end up worse - if you hate Cameron Posh imagine him as President because that is what the public would end up doing. I can't see millions of Chinese visitors flooding to London to see him can you?
For all manner of stats and facts during games, add me on twitter: @Gills_Stats
Previous board user ID: gwade_871 (3440 posts)