What the hell?????????

Discussion relating to anything Gillingham FC

Re: What the hell?????????

Postby Elgrande » Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:23 pm

I think Posh described them well. The more unpleasant of society. When I was married my stepgaughter was a housing officer and she once told me how "Social" housing was allocated. 1. Benefits with children; 2 drug offenders released from rehab, 3.released prisoners; 4 Asylum seekers and then those on the list who are in work.
As for the free market; there is no reason why government can't look outside the box. Change of use for empty office blocks; refurb the thousands of empty houses left after the failure of the regional regeneration schemes, prefabs, static caravans etc. If a maximum returned applied to state backed developments (5%) there are lots of ways rents for single / double occupation properties could be kept below £250 per month. It is possible to create properties of 40 m2 that are comfortable and offer ample living space, but we continue to construct properties in the most expensive way possible.
If we could create these affordable homes people could afford to take many of the jobs being offered and still have a life, not just an existence.
Elgrande
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:59 am

Re: What the hell?????????

Postby gillsfan1066 » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:49 am

Yeah, yeah, yeah , all the "unpleasant" in our society should have nice housing ,just not anywhere near me thank you. They tell me the Outer Hebrides is very nice at this time of year, give them some sticks and a bit of canvas tell them to go build a tent and enjoy their stinking lives .
Time to employ more "do gooders", doing good for those that don't deserve it or appreciate it.
gillsfan1066
 
Posts: 4456
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:13 pm

Re: What the hell?????????

Postby Poshgill » Fri Dec 14, 2012 8:39 am

You obviously have'nt read this thread have or if you have, then you have not understood it! :?

Anyway, back to the discussion: Agree with what you say Elg. Social Housing is now stigmatised because councils and housing authorities have misguided rules about who they allocate to. No doubt some will blame Lefties in the council, but the point is, the demise of proper council housing is to blame. Not only the housing, but the rules of allocation. Proper waiting lists with means testing. I remember council estates that the peole were proud to live in. Tidy gardens, sense of community. Thats all gone now!
Poshgill
 
Posts: 167
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:31 pm

Re: What the hell?????????

Postby Rimshot » Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:32 pm

You're right Posh, we too lived in a council house as a family of five and it was seen as a sensible and respectable option for working class people. Appalling policies like creating 'people dumps' with all the problem families deposited in the same estate contributed towards the problem you now describe and, I'm afraid, a succession of photo-opps for Tory politicians smugly handing over the keys of sold-off housing stock. Places , incidentally, that they would n't have lived in if they had been paid to .

The ownership of land is a major issue here but of course when such a lot of it belongs to those nice people like the Royal family, The Duke of Westminster and the church commissioners it is all too delicate to broach.

The construction industry is in dire straits, the ownership of land is preposterously skewed towards inherited estates and there are lots of people out of work. There are answers here so glaringly obvious that even a fool could see them. What's lacking is any kind of political will to challenge the status quo. While we retain the monarchy and the trailing entrails of aristocracy which survives upon the same arcane premise that there is a natural 'ruling class' , nothing will change.

Most property ownership, historically, is the product of theft, invasion and war, later legitimised by the victor's judiciary.
Rimshot
 
Posts: 658
Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:03 am

Re: What the hell?????????

Postby Elgrande » Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:16 pm

Sorry rimmer that is a bit of a rant. There was less social housing built during the Nu labour boom years than at any time since its inception. The biggest problem is the unregulated price boom that happened from 1998 - 2008. If "cheap" properties were now built many homeowners would scream blue murder because there house values would fall as well. The continuance of this countries obsession with building with the most expensive, least cost effective materials, the supposed stigma of living in high rise flats and the ridiculous size of properties that are built for single / couples causes most of the problems. I am working with a friend of mine on a presentation on "how to provide affordable homes" using available land and properties and it is quite scary how cheaply it could be done. One of the biggest problems is the "snobbery" around alternative housing options.
Elgrande
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:59 am

Re: What the hell?????????

Postby gillsfan1066 » Sat Dec 15, 2012 2:13 am

Yes Posh I read it ,just had trouble finding the bit about GFC, but I guess it is there somewhere lol?
gillsfan1066
 
Posts: 4456
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 8:13 pm

Previous

Return to GILLS DISCUSSION

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 29 guests