I think you are missing the point Rimshot. There is some strange reasoning that makes the press always give the benefit of the doubt to all things Liverpool. Their fans have killed more opposition fans than any other English Club, but the press will hound any other club but those "good humoured Koppites" the same ones that used to throw bags of urine and filed down coins at the opposition fans. Their domination of the late 70's and the 80's was funded by the football pools and they had more money than any other club, but unlike Man Utd they never got a lot of flack for it. Leeds Utd used to get slaughtered for having hard men in their team, but Tommy Smith, Jimmy Case, Souness, Mcmahon, Hughes et al were no Angels, but the press used to gloss that over. Even now after 20 years of no title they still get more attention than other clubs that have an equal record and as for Rogers when he wins the title he will be as good manager a manger as he thinks he is.
You are right I despise them because I know what they were really like with their Stanley knives their organised "steaming" of shops all over Europe that never got reported in the UK, but was well documented all over Europe, their continuing wailing about always being the victims, but an almost denial of the events at Heysel. Even the BBC seem to think that interviewing fans in Istanbul that admitted they had no tickets, but would get in anyway just showed their passion for their team, not their complete disregard for safety and their own history.
